WHAT IS THE CAUSE OF THE CANCER? - BY MARIO MICHELANGELO STROMILLO

It is very likely that the official science will explain that my theory is not scientifically acceptable because science has its rules, its official and not official conventions, its requirements and its obligations, for which my theory should be certainly acceptable, if the method that allowed me the outcome, andnamely the Integral Biology, were matter of advanced teaching officially acknowledged.

Certainly, the science has agreed to frailer theories and physical laws quite paradoxical, as the law of the action and contrary reaction that becomes true when it affirms that a reaction is never absolutely equal and contrary to the action: at least, because the times are different and, therefore, the spaces are different too.

The mistake may be smallest for some artificial motions, but it becomes greatest when we consider the natural motions.

As far as the scientists are concerned, we have to know a theory before agreeing to it – and always with reserve – and we must already feel it acceptable before wanting to know it.

Then, I have little to say to the authentic scientists, because everybody of them, in his field, is better than me.

The “MuN” is there: before us and within us. I have not invented it.

To apply the “MuN” to the atomic numeric is certainly easier to aphysicist than to a doctor.

The dearth principle is logical before being scientific.

The correction of the cohesion of the gravitation is, scientifically, absolutely necessary.

Otherwise, it is impossible for us to understand the 50% of the biological phenomena.

Maybe, I may say

- that we have been wrong in measuring the existing force by a non existent mean: to that we have got a little late at the idea of space force;

- that we have been wrong in considering the natural motions on the ground of laws nearly good in the artificial motions: we has been better consider the artificial motions, that are greatly complicated, on the ground of the natural motions, that are greatly simple;

- that we have been wrong in using the disease as therapeutical agent (in the vaccinations) without knowing or, at least, supposing what the disease were

but, maybe, once we could not even behave in a different way.

I may say that

- to go on making the atomic experiments.

- to be the microbiosurgeons of the nuclear organic molecules;

- to pierce the crust of the earth to attain the planetary nucleus.

Are not necessary mistakes, be cause they certainly derange the energetic

System of the earth in the atmosphere, on the surface of the earth’s crust,

and under the layers of the earth’s crust.

To say that the underground or underwater atomic bombs are less noxious

than the atmospheric ones is a criminal absurdity originating from the

man’s dream of living on the Earth,whereas he has not yet realized that

the man does not live on the earth, but on the surface of the earth’s crust

and within that energetic system, called earth, going from the nucleus of

the earth to the astrosphere’s limits.

On the other hand, every child, though he is not big-headed, coming into

a biochemical laboratory, much less provided and strong than the Nature’s

laboratory, after a while, is able to cause some explosions, amusing

himself.

It is difficult, then, to go out of that laboratory bringing in one’s hands or in one’s head something helpful to man, to-day and to-morrow.

I may say that the integral biology has showed itself to be a helpful science cither for the theoretical derivations or for human and existential derivations or for human and existential derivations. On the other hand, it is a matter of a boundless biology, having its limits exlusively in the limits of wo practices it. My limits were evidently restricted. Many others should havecertainlyseen, on that same way, some things much more interesting than mines were.

I think however,that it is a certainly helpful and interesting science thatone that helps us to explain the reason.

- Way there is something in common among the eye’s crystalline lens, the

knee-cap, the sesamoid bone of the first metacarpo-phalangeous

articulation, the intervertebral disks and the muscular striated fibres;

- why the persistence of the pupillar membrane and the persistence of the anal membrane belong to the cancer ( because of lcking in the zero effect of the “gel” changing a volume of substance in a nucleus of energy,

- why a verruca that is in the upper half of the left part of the nose turns easily into cancer,whereas the right one not;

- why the heart congenital defects belong to cancer;

- why, at a given moment, the cancer is always one, that is, it is always in an only place of our body;

- why the teeth are before 20 and then 32, or why the heart cavities and the encephalic ventricular cavities are 4;

- why the nuclear dissemination and the fragmentation of a red globule are evolutive;

- why the most serious cancer, by nature, is not the carcinoma or thr heavy cancer with individual effect, but the mental cancer with social effect, allowing the widest unsettled and disvolutive effect in the time and in the space;

- why the so-called death of the man has always taken place in a cancer’s effect

- why in every region, it is possible to make a scientific forecast of to tomorrow’s diseases on the ground of to-day’s diseases,

- why, if we were really able to read what is written in our hand, we could recognize in addition to man’s destiny, humanity’s destiny too.

It is possible for some scientifists to remark a little freedom in the terminology of the energy and of the substance. And with reason

But I am not the only one who is in the wrong.

The natural only motion, the energetic contiguity principle, and the cohesional correction of the gravitation change the ideas pf weight and mass, so that in front of these lots of elementary and fundamental marks that are present, at first, and we cannot see them, then they form the inorganic substance – that may be the organic one of other worlds - , then, nearly to unify and improve the function they turn into the organic substance and, then, after having unified the function, they retrench the organic substance in functional nucleus, nearly for a space saving. I say that you may exuse me for some equivocating definitions.

Also because, it is for the physicist and mathematicians to establish a conventional terminology in the matter.

Evaluare: 5.0/5 (2 voturi)

WHAT IS THE CAUSE OF THE CANCER? - BY MARIO MICHELANGELO STROMILLO

Arhiva fisiere